F-35 C++ Safety Metrics Beat Scala 3 Slowness
Summary
Understanding low-level language constraints and migration risks is crucial for maintaining system integrity and avoiding costly operational delays in critical software.
- Synchronization Trade-offs Discussed the critical choice between spinlocks (atomic operations) and mutexes based on expected contention levels 1.
- C Declaration Utility Introduced cdecl-dump, a command-line tool that visually represents complex C declarations for clarity 2.
- F-35 Standard Strictness Highlighted the rigorous C++ standard mandated for the safety-critical F-35 fighter jet program 4.
- JVM/LLVM Interop Demonstrated running Java code by compiling directly to LLVM Intermediate Representation (IR) instead of bytecode 3.
- Scala 3 Rollout Issues Migration from Scala 2.13 to 3.7.3 introduced unforeseen latency, causing Kafka issues 6 hours into staged rollouts 5.
- 2.13 to 3.7.3 - The specific Scala versions involved in the problematic migration path 5.
- 6 hours - Time elapsed into the staged rollout before Kafka issues manifested post-migration 5.
- Atomic Ops - The underlying mechanism used by spinlocks like LOCK CMPXCHG 1.
Key Moments
-
The choice between spinlocks and mutexes depends on critical section duration and contention level.
— Article [1] -
The tool accepts standard C declarations and outputs a visual tree structure on the CLI.
— Article [2] -
Kafka performance degraded 5-6 hours into staged rollouts following the Scala 3 upgrade.
— Article [5] -
Java development shifted focus from generating Java bytecode to utilizing Java to build and execute LLVM IR.
— Article [3]
Different Perspectives
Supporting View
The F-35's reliance on C++ underscores the need for strict, verifiable language subsets in safety-critical aerospace systems.
Sources:
[4]